HotelsStarwood Hotels wins trademark battle with local developer in the Philippines.

What’s in a single letter? A lot if it’s a W

|
Starwood has defended its ownership over a unique and particular stylised W.
Starwood has defended its ownership over a unique and particular stylised W. Photo Credit: W Osaka

The Supreme Court in the Philippines has ruled in favour of Starwood Hotels and Resorts in a dispute with a local developer over Starwood’s W trademark. 

W Land Holdings wanted to use the W brand on its Tower development in Bonifacio Global City, claiming that Starwood had forfeited the trademark on the grounds of non-use.

Oceanic filed the trademarks in 2015, while luxury hotel operator Starwood registered its W trademarks in 2007.

The dispute has dragged through government departments and lower court hearings, but now the Supreme Court has upheld Starwood’s case.

The Supreme Court said it recognised Starwood's use of interactive websites that allow Philippine residents to book international hotels as sufficient proof of “actual use” of the mark in the country, despite the company not operating a physical hotel in the Philippines at the time. It also noted that Starwood does not lay claim over “any and all configurations of the letter W”. 

“Rather, it defends its ownership over a unique and particular stylised W”.

W Tower in Bonifacio Global City is owned and developed by the W Group, a major Philippine real estate and holding company established by the prominent Wee family. 

In allowing Starwood’s appeal, the Supreme Court ordered the cancellation of the W Tower trademark and blocking the W Global Centre and W Fifth Avenue marks for being confusingly similar to the global W Hotels brand.

JDS Travel News JDS Viewpoints JDS Africa/MI